|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
double xp feat
I think a double xp feat for a single game should be added to cash shop, in addition to the 10game double xp one.
Alot of the time we want to play ffas or small games (2x2 for instance), and someone sais he cant, because he has double xp and doesnt want to waste it on a low xp game. he would rather wait for a mega for instance.
So I think there should be a feat for a single game, that would cost ~15% of the current double xp feat. That way you could buy double xp for a single game, but if you buy the 10game double xp you save 33% cash. it would drive people to buy both. it would also boost buying items, because people with cash that usually buy double xp for megas will play more games, not only ones with loads of xp, and thus lose more items and buy more.
What do you guys think? Basicly I'm not a casher I dont really have a problem with the way it is now, but there arent many active high levels at the moment, and its difficult to find games when they want to wait for megas in order to not "waste" the double xp feats they baught.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
|
I think a double xp feat for a single game should be added to cash shop, in addition to the 10game double xp one.
Alot of the time we want to play ffas or small games (2x2 for instance), and someone sais he cant, because he has double xp and doesnt want to waste it on a low xp game. he would rather wait for a mega for instance.
So I think there should be a feat for a single game, that would cost ~15% of the current double xp feat. That way you could buy double xp for a single game, but if you buy the 10game double xp you save 33% cash. it would drive people to buy both. it would also boost buying items, because people with cash that usually buy double xp for megas will play more games, not only ones with loads of xp, and thus lose more items and buy more.
What do you guys think? Basicly I'm not a casher I dont really have a problem with the way it is now, but there arent many active high levels at the moment, and its difficult to find games when they want to wait for megas in order to not "waste" the double xp feats they baught.
yes....nice idea🙄
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Hmmm i vote no - I think the bundle pack is the way to go.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
|
and thus lose more items and buy more.
..
MEANIE! lol >_< 😁
i agree, we all know casher dont have infinite money (yeah you wish ENKORD ^_^) so they must have something a little cheaper to settle for, instead of buying say 50 games worth of double exp knowing there will be many tiny matches in between all the megas 😉
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Sounds good to me: more things to choose from = more shopping = better for all.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Sounds like a plausible idea there... there is a "Reset All" and "Reset Perk/Skill" in the shop. So why stop there? It'll give players that drive players into the game to get rewarded with extra EXP and entice them to do it more!
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
YOUR ALL SMOKING CRACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TO HELL WITH DOUBLE EXP, AND TO HELL WITH MEGAS, AND TO HELL WITH NAKED FFA'S.....................
lol just had to get that off my chest, but yes i totally agree with Red, i had double exp not to long ago, and 3 of the 10 games i wasted on little 1x1 and ffa games, there should be a 1 game exp option in shop.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Smaller purchases are just another way for us as customers to save a buck - and when we save a buck... Enkord is out a buck - There is absolutely no reason to provide a smaller package of what Enkord already provides for us - We should be thankful that there even IS a double XP option.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
There is absolutely no reason to provide a smaller package
err, RR just told you a good reason. It smaller package xp bonus means people are more willing to play other games than just megas, which means more games played, and in doing so will probably shop more items too.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
|
We should be thankful that there even IS a double XP option.
i agree with this part, we are lucky there is a double exp feature, otherwise astor and live still be lvl 30 and bers will be lvl 27 ^_^
i still suggest a smaller pack, can be a very good move, even if enkord doesnt get the maximum amount, they are still getting some money from players, which is better then no money at all from lower amount of cash players😉
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
err, RR just told you a good reason. It smaller package xp bonus means people are more willing to play other games than just megas, which means more games played, and in doing so will probably shop more items too.
That is all speculation at best - I use double xp and it runs out when it runs out - quit worrying about what kind of games you play LOL - Most people who use double xp don't care much about what types of games they play imo.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
That is all speculation at best
Your arguments are somehow less speculation? 😁 Come on
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Why are people wanting smaller purchases? - to save money? - there is no reason otherwise...
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
why not have the ability to turn it on or off... that way people don't "waste" it on 1v1's os small games like that
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Why are people wanting smaller purchases? - to save money? - there is no reason otherwise...
Actually you are very wrong about this one. As I said, the 1game double xp feature should cost around 15% of the 10game double xp feature. which means if someone buys 10 single games, he pays more, not less. 33% more actually, which is alot.
This is a very economic move and also very proffitable. go to any big store or brand around the world and you will see this. the most common example is burning discs - you can buy a 100disk pack for 10$, or a 10 disk pack for 1.5$ or a 50disk pack for 6$.
It lets people who dont spend alot of money on cash shop, just a little, buy the double xp feature for one game from time to time.
Also as I said, It means more games played, and thus more items baught on cash shop. this is not a speculation, I've asked and seen many players about this, and its a fact that most players that buy the double xp feature once in a while (im not talking about people who cash up every 2 days) dont want to "Waste" the feature on 1x1 games, and would rather see it live up to its full potential, in mega games mostly.
The idea that more games means more cash isn't mine, its berserker's. thats his explanation for why naked matches give less xp - because if there is a bonus for armed matches, then there are more armed matches, and thus more item loss, and thus more demand for items >> which means more cash spent. it's very logical, it has nothing to do with speculation.
HomeRnDrby1 I'm glad you think so, and hope you admins push for this to be implemented as soon as possible ☺
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
why not have the ability to turn it on or off... that way people don't "waste" it on 1v1's os small games like that
Thats a nice idea too, but I think it would take a bit more scripting than the 1game double xp feature.
It's also less proffitable for enkord, so I dont think it would be implemented. My idea is more proffitable, so I dont see a reason why it shouldn't be implemented ☺
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
LOL Red_Ranger - you seem to think you have it all figured out then i guess eh - I am not going to argue with you on the forums - The bottom line is they are not going to sell 7 singles for every 10 pack they "would have" sold in its place. And you wanna know the kicker? Your idea slightly promotes "mega fake fight" - People might buy a single right before they fake... or they might be forced to buy a 10 pack...
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
LOL Red_Ranger - you seem to think you have it all figured out then i guess eh - I am not going to argue with you on the forums - The bottom line is they are not going to sell 7 singles for every 10 pack they "would have" sold in its place. And you wanna know the kicker? Your idea slightly promotes "mega fake fight" - People might buy a single right before they fake... or they might be forced to buy a 10 pack...
Well..
1. Yes I do think I have it all figured out. I don't see you coming up with a logical reason as to why i'm wrong. saying "I wont argue with you on forums" doesn't make any point. the forums are exactly for that lol, I made a suggestion, if you think its a bad one please explain why.
2. I never said they would see 7 singles for every 10 they "would have" sold. I said some people will buy the 10game one, and some would buy the single game one. the fact is if there is someone with lower cash, he would preffer to buy a single game double xp than a 10 game one.
3. As for the kicker.. that really makes me laugh. are you that naive Dew? Fake fighters will be fake fighters. adding a single game double xp feature doesnt promote fake fighting rofl. If you really think that this will make more people fake fight, or make fake fighters do "mega fake fights", then stop thinking lol.
I don't understand why you are opposed to this suggestion dude. nothing you've said so far explains why you are, or suggests that this is a bad idea. Again, yes I do think I have it all figured out. it seems very logical to me. if its not, please do share with the rest of us why it isnt.. and saying "This would promote mega fake fighting" or "this will just get people to spend less money".. Who's making the speculations now Dew? and thats not even regarding the fact that it's simply not true, and not a valid explanation.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
You've got your title for good reason "paranoid one"!
Let's not confuse our customers with more options than they can handle ☺ Cause let's face it, no one has thought it all through like you have ☺
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
You've got your title for good reason "paranoid one"!
Let's not confuse our customers with more options than they can handle ☺ Cause let's face it, no one has thought it all through like you have ☺
What is this?!?! a diversion to try and get me to talk about paranoya instead of the topic?! It wont work Dew!! you cant trick me!!!! ( ☺ )
Still thats not a valid reason why this suggestion isn't a good one ☺ And thus I conclude, this suggestion is good! :P
|
|
