|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Is this tournament a joke ??
What is goin on with this tournament level 30-50😲 lmao what chance have the level 30-40 players got in this ??😕 next to none , this tourney is pointless and u want us to pay to enter lmao thats even more of a joke 😁 ...
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Impossible!!!
Thats the JOKE of the month i think..
Imagin a lvl 30 is playing vs lvl 50 and u can use arts TOO !!😲
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
At least people will stop bugging me about why there is no tournament for high levels. You asked for it? - You got it! Enjoy!
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
yes but it should be 2 seperate tournaments 30-39 and 40-50.
So u give us a tournament where the majority of players that can enter have no chance of winning and only the 40+ players have any reason to enter, so u havent given the 30-40 players a real tournament and as we could have entered this one wont get one for a long time...
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Allowing arts smoothens big level difference cause right now it's more down to who has better arts. Starting level 30-50 tournament without arts is even worse. Overall tournament for high level players is a joke anyway, even with level ranges proposed by you, cause there are simply not enough players. Running several tournaments for only 5-10 players each is simply pointless cause even 25-29 tournaments feature low amount of players, let alone 30-39 or 40-50 - see past tournament stats.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
must be some super uber arts for a 30 to take on 50 who also has arts lol
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Do you want to bet $1000 that I can win this tournament with level 30 with arts?
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
lol u are the one man who can make his own arts so nope no way im bettin u $1000 lmao , now if u had 2 find all the arts first and were not allowed to gamble them with ur infinite Enk cash, then maybe i might bet ☺
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Running several tournaments for only 5-10 players each is simply pointless cause even 25-29 tournaments feature low amount of players, let alone 30-39 or 40-50 - see past tournament stats.
but doin it like this means only lev 40-50 will enter anway
except massage lol but hes crazy (joking)
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Hmm low level wants tourney just without arts because art-tourneys just stupid and you do it. Now you start a tourney like this also with tickets and i very high possible leveldifference. Just a funny and useless tourney for the most of the few player who can join.
Can you tell me how a player of level 30+ should reach a tourney medal if you start just tourneys like this?
Btw. not the number of players is important. Just look the stats of low-level-tourney and the number of technical KO. I remember at one tourney the first or 2nd place was just winning 2-3 matches. All other was tko or free move into next round.
Also there could be other ways for a tourney of higher levels. For example with another kind of rounds: Maybe 2 victorys of 3 matches wanted to go into next round. Or different kind of match-end-result. Maybe not just the winner go into next round. Better the player with more exp at end of match. So a loser with high damage have a chance too. I dont know but maybe this would to hard for the lvl50 vs lvl 30 so another idea: Count given damage*opponentlevel of both players and the player with higher result goes into next round also if he lose the match.
You see there could be some other ways to start a high-level-tourney with chances for all. But i believe i tourney like this is just useless for the most.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
yes + the higher lev`s are more likely to turn up for tourny unlike the majority of the lower levels.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
You see there could be some other ways to start a high-level-tourney with chances for all.
No I don't. Show me.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
No I don't. Show me.
Maybe you read the section of my post you dont quote 😉
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Maybe you read the section of my post you dont quote 😉
There was nothing relevant to reality that was out of quotation.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
guys i think the only way we will be plzed is if bers will do more clan turnements cuz in this way high lvl have more fun in litle megas.
so 1x1 in high lvl is out high lvl turny clanvclan is in.
btw i say make low lvl acc and strart play low lvl turnyments
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
There was nothing relevant to reality that was out of quotation.
Why not? Its possible to think about a tourney with 3 matches against the same opponent per round and the winner of 2 of this matches can go to next round. So a tourney with a lower number of participants wants same or maybe a higher number of victorys for the tourney-winner.
Or a tourney like championsleague at soccer. For example 20 participants start in 4 groups with 5 player. At the first 4 days every player must fight against all player of his groupe. Victory give you 3 points, lose 0 point, draw 1 point (because timeout-match or double TKO).
The both best players with most points of every groupe reach the next round. If you have same points of 2 player you could count kills or given damage. The last 8 player play 1vs1, 4 winners play 1vs1 and you have semifinal and final. All together a participant must play 4 groupematches and 3 kick-out-matches to win the tourney same effort like a 400player-tourney.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Currently automated tournament system do not support 3 battles for 1 match and other variations and spending valuable resources to adjust it only to make tournament for 5 people is unreasonable to say at least.
And speaking about clan tournaments - we have Hall of Fame battles which serves basically the same purpose so there will be no clan tournaments, I can assure you.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
Tourney for higher level is always a gift for all of your trusty long-time-player.
There is no reason to change the automatical tourney-system. Its just ideas because you dont want to start a tourney for a smaller number of players and the smaller efford to win this. You could start an automatical tourney with normal style too. Its also fine but you don't want to do this, and this is sad.
Other idea could make the prizes grow with the number of participants.
For example:
1. Price: (participants*100*startlvl/10) ecash & (participants/50 but minimal 2) arts
2. Price: (participants*50*startlvl/10) ecash & (participants/100 but minimal 1) arts.
Tourney with 400 player lvl10-15:
1. Price: 40000 ecash & 8 arts. (400*100*10/10) & (400/50)
2. Price: 20000 ecash & 4 arts. (400*50*10/10) & (400/100)
Tourney with 15 player lvl 30-35:
1. Price: 4500 ecash & 2 arts. (15*100*30/10) & (15/50 but minimal2)
2. Price: 2250 ecash & 1 arts. (15*50*30/10) & (15/100 but minimal1)
Its only your decision, but it seems the devoted community isnt important enough for you.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
I dont want to start tournament for only 5 players not because of prizes, but because like you said even small tournaments take about the same time as big ones (at least 3 days for registration + 5-8 days for rounds). And when those 5 players play, rest 10000 must wait. Trusty long-time-players have enough gifts and we made automated tournaments to encuorage newcomers and lure them into more dedicated gaming. Practice shows high level tournaments add no real value to the game despite your efforts to say otherwise.
|
|
This post created by ignored player and thus hidden.
Double click to show.
|
![]()
|
i dont understand what all the fuss about, i will win anyhow ☺
kidding
anyhow, i am sure all can understand the main idea of the thread. which is - 20 level gap is way to much. with or without arts, and i will take any 30 with no matter what arts he have and deal him my own ☺
its much more realistic to play 30-40 41-50 no question in here.
and bers, you know i have respect for you, but most of the times is better to not do anything then doing only an half job.
i must say, after i read all the posts here, that you care less for the high levels in game.
to say, high tourny as have no worth you any, and you call it a joke. well its just taste bad for me.
i was hoping we getting much more respect then that.
this is a competetive game and every one want to show/know what he worth.
so if you doing a tourny to higher levels and we (the highst levels) feel its a bit rotten so maybe it is. no need to get offended of it or thinking we are not preciate it.
just make it better and funnier for us.
and yes, i dont want the silver medal of tournies allready ☺
|
|
